FILTERING OUT TATTOOS ON A MATRIMONIAL SITE

Tattoos have become mainstream in America, so common that even people who are averse to getting one themselves may not require the same of a potential mate. After all, tattoos can be conspicuous as well as discreet. A small tattoo on an ankle should not disqualify a person who otherwise meets all your requirements, should it?

Itโ€™s apparently still a deal-breaker for many Indians, if a social media post by Jasveer Singh, CEO of Knot Dating, is any indication. โ€œRunning a matrimony platform means some requirement is always coming up,โ€ he wrote. โ€œHeight, salary, color, education, profession, all of this is very common. But today, I heard a new one.โ€

The โ€œnew oneโ€ came through feedback from a premium member: โ€œThe guy was very, very clear โ€” โ€˜I donโ€™t want to get married to any girl who has a tattoo,โ€™โ€ Singh wrote. โ€œI was just thinking, how do you even filter out the tattoo part? You cannot create another filter and start asking everyone, โ€˜Do you have a tattoo or not?โ€™ And he was very clear. He doesnโ€™t want to marry anyone who has a tattoo. I have heard all kinds of requirements, but this one was new for me.โ€

Some commenters were surprised that it was a โ€œnew oneโ€ for Singh. โ€œVery reasonable request,โ€ one wrote. โ€œSurprised you did not get it till date.โ€

Considering how common tattoos are, perhaps the filtering question shouldnโ€™t be โ€˜Do you have a tattoo or not?โ€™ Perhaps it should be: How many tattoos do you have? (a) Zero; (b) Fewer than three; (c) Fewer than 10; (d) Iโ€™ve lost count.


Compiled and partly written by Indian humorist MELVIN DURAI, author of the novel Bala Takes the Plunge. [Comments? Contributions? Please email us at melvin@melvindurai.com. We welcome jokes, quotes, online clips, and more.]


Archives

Leave a Reply